<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marginalia on the word &#8216;cunt&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/05/04/marginalia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/05/04/marginalia/</link>
	<description>Harry Rutherford's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Chandler</title>
		<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/05/04/marginalia/#comment-18329</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heracliteanfire.net/?p=1870#comment-18329</guid>
		<description>Okay, I'll backpedal. I'm a Clinton supporter, after all.

I have a certain &lt;i&gt;respect&lt;/i&gt; for the term and its history, though apparently it has always been pejorative. But then name me a non-scientific term for a woman's vulva that is not used pejoratively.

Same might be said for a man's penis?? Though generally I think having balls is seen as a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll backpedal. I&#8217;m a Clinton supporter, after all.</p>
<p>I have a certain <i>respect</i> for the term and its history, though apparently it has always been pejorative. But then name me a non-scientific term for a woman&#8217;s vulva that is not used pejoratively.</p>
<p>Same might be said for a man&#8217;s penis?? Though generally I think having balls is seen as a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Chandler</title>
		<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/05/04/marginalia/#comment-18328</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heracliteanfire.net/?p=1870#comment-18328</guid>
		<description>[...] has a generally interesting post about the different connotations of the word cunt in Great Britain. &#8230;in British English: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a generally interesting post about the different connotations of the word cunt in Great Britain. &#8230;in British English: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/05/04/marginalia/#comment-18327</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heracliteanfire.net/?p=1870#comment-18327</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am actually fairly fond of the word “cunt” to describe a woman’s genitalia.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Really? It always seems a bit... hard. Which is why it's well suited as an insult: you can really inject some venom into it when you say it.

The Chaucerian 'quenyte' has slightly less of a fist-smashing-into-a-side-of-beef quality to it, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am actually fairly fond of the word “cunt” to describe a woman’s genitalia.</p></blockquote>
<p>Really? It always seems a bit&#8230; hard. Which is why it&#8217;s well suited as an insult: you can really inject some venom into it when you say it.</p>
<p>The Chaucerian &#8216;quenyte&#8217; has slightly less of a fist-smashing-into-a-side-of-beef quality to it, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Chandler</title>
		<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/05/04/marginalia/#comment-18326</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heracliteanfire.net/?p=1870#comment-18326</guid>
		<description>Love the photo. I may cop it. Time to add a little levity to my over-earnest meanderings.

I am actually fairly fond of the word "cunt" to describe a woman's genitalia. That comes from being married for a long time to a scholar of Medieval English with a love for Chaucer and an interest in Latin poetry, especially Catullus. Still, I don't think the founders of C.U.N.T. have much interest in etymology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the photo. I may cop it. Time to add a little levity to my over-earnest meanderings.</p>
<p>I am actually fairly fond of the word &#8220;cunt&#8221; to describe a woman&#8217;s genitalia. That comes from being married for a long time to a scholar of Medieval English with a love for Chaucer and an interest in Latin poetry, especially Catullus. Still, I don&#8217;t think the founders of C.U.N.T. have much interest in etymology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
