<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/06/17/links-16th-june-08-to-17th-june-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/06/17/links-16th-june-08-to-17th-june-08/</link>
	<description>Harry Rutherford&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:50:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/06/17/links-16th-june-08-to-17th-june-08/comment-page-1/#comment-18539</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heracliteanfire.net/?p=1941#comment-18539</guid>
		<description>I thought the supreme court thing was interesting because it feeds into some arguments I&#039;ve had about scansion: I know some people insist on analysing English with four levels of stress, and have a resultantly elaborate understanding of how to scan a poem. This has never chimed with my perception, and I might be inclined to claim that I could use the article above to argue my case. I might need a linguist to back me up, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the supreme court thing was interesting because it feeds into some arguments I&#8217;ve had about scansion: I know some people insist on analysing English with four levels of stress, and have a resultantly elaborate understanding of how to scan a poem. This has never chimed with my perception, and I might be inclined to claim that I could use the article above to argue my case. I might need a linguist to back me up, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Chandler</title>
		<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/06/17/links-16th-june-08-to-17th-june-08/comment-page-1/#comment-18535</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heracliteanfire.net/?p=1941#comment-18535</guid>
		<description>[...] Courtesy of Harry. Harry Partch&#8217;s InstrumentsJackson PollockThe Grammar of ResponsibilityBored at work?The business of poetry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Courtesy of Harry. Harry Partch&#8217;s InstrumentsJackson PollockThe Grammar of ResponsibilityBored at work?The business of poetry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Chandler</title>
		<link>http://heracliteanfire.net/2008/06/17/links-16th-june-08-to-17th-june-08/comment-page-1/#comment-18530</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heracliteanfire.net/?p=1941#comment-18530</guid>
		<description>Well, I played Boomshine all the way to the end, got ranked #400 for the day, out of 518. Not so hot, huh? But I never did figure out what I was doing -- obviously trying to trigger a cascade but how?

As for the Supremes, I&#039;m afraid I lost interest soon after reading that Clarence Thomas didn&#039;t talk enough to count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I played Boomshine all the way to the end, got ranked #400 for the day, out of 518. Not so hot, huh? But I never did figure out what I was doing &#8212; obviously trying to trigger a cascade but how?</p>
<p>As for the Supremes, I&#8217;m afraid I lost interest soon after reading that Clarence Thomas didn&#8217;t talk enough to count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
