Unfortunately the hoaxers like Carl Baugh have given a bad rap to creation scientists in general. Many do not realize the number of REAL creation scientists out there. And many of them are known not simply “for being creationists”, but for being skilled in their field (chemists, physicists, mathematicians, physiologists, etc.) and they believe in creation science. Remember also that the origins issue is in the realm of metaphysics, not so much the observational science, although the observational fields are involved.
Unfortunately the hoaxers like Carl Baugh have given a bad rap to creation scientists in general.
No, it’s their complete failure to come to terms the fact that their discipline is intellectually bankrupt with has given a bad rap to creation scientists.
2 replies on “Links”
Unfortunately the hoaxers like Carl Baugh have given a bad rap to creation scientists in general. Many do not realize the number of REAL creation scientists out there. And many of them are known not simply “for being creationists”, but for being skilled in their field (chemists, physicists, mathematicians, physiologists, etc.) and they believe in creation science. Remember also that the origins issue is in the realm of metaphysics, not so much the observational science, although the observational fields are involved.
No, it’s their complete failure to come to terms the fact that their discipline is intellectually bankrupt with has given a bad rap to creation scientists.